Pepsi : Promoting Nothing Case Study

 Pepsi : Promoting Nothing Case Study

WATER WARS

Everyone's familiar with the cola wars - the epic battles between Pepsi Cola and Coca-Cola in the soft-drink market. The war has featured numerous taste tests and mostly friendly, but sometimes not-so-friendly, television ads featuring Pepsi and Coke delivery-truck drivers, each trying to out-do the other. But one of the major problems that Pepsi and Coke face is to not just out-do each other, but to maintain growth, especially when the soda market goes flat. For this reason, both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola each have hundreds if not thousands of brands in soft-drink and snack food categories. Each is also constantly looking for new ideas to increase sales.

One of those ideas is water. In the early 1990s, the bottled-water market was just a drop in the huge U.S.beverage market bucket. The Evian and Perrier brands dominated the tiny niche and helped establish bottled spring water's clean, healthy image. Pepsi took an early interest in the water market. It tried several different ways to attack this market, with both spring water and sparkling water, but each failed. Then it hit on the idea of taking advantage of a built-in resource - its existing bottlers.

Pepsi's bottlers already had their own water treatment facilities to purify municipal tap water used in making soft drinks. Municipal tap water was already pure and had to pass constant monitoring and rigorous quarterly EPA-prescribed tests. Still, cola bottlers filtered it again before using it in the production process.

Pepsi decided that it would really filter the tap water. It experimented with a reverse osmosis process, pushing already-filtered tap water at high pressure through fiber-glass membranes to remove even the tiniest particles. Then, carbon filters removed chlorine and any other particles that might give the water any taste or smell. However, all this filtering removed even good particles that killed bacteria, so Pepsi had to add ozone to the water to keep bacteria from growing. The result? Aquafina - a water with no taste or odor-that Pepsi believed could compete with the spring waters already on the market. Further, Pepsi could license its bottlers to use the Aquafina name and sell them the filtration equipment. Because the process used tap water that was relatively inexpensive, Pepsi's Aquafina would also compete well on price with the spring waters.

The marketing strategy was relatively simple. Whereas Evian and the other early entrants targeted women and high-end consumers, Pepsi wanted consumers to see Aquafina as a "unisex, mainstream” water with an everyday price. When the company launched the product in 1994, it was content just to build distribution using its established system and spent very little money on promotion. Pepsi believed that soft-drink advertising should be for soft drinks, not water.

COME ON IN-THE WATER'S FINE

By 1999, what had been a minor trickle in the beverage market had turned into a geyser - bottled water had become the fastest-growing beverage category, and Pepsi had a big head start. Coca-Cola decided it was time to take the plunge. Like Pepsi, Coca-Cola realized its bottlers were already set up to handle a filtered-water process. Unlike Pepsi, however, rather than taking everything out of the tap water, it wanted to put something in.

Coca-Cola's researchers analyzed tap waters and bottled waters and concocted a combination of minerals they believed would give filtered tap watera fresh, clean taste. The formula included magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, and salt. Coca-Cola guarded the new water formula just as it had the original Coke recipe. Thus, it could sell the formula 2to its bottlers, as it does Coke concentrate, and let them make the water. Like Pepsi, Coca-Cola was content initially just to get its water, which it called Dasani, into distribution.

HOW TO PROMOTE WATER

By 2001, however, the bottled-water category had over 800 competitors and had grown to $3.53 billion in U.S. sales. Bottled water's market share of the beverage industry had grown from 7.4 percent in1997 to 11 percent in 2002. At that time, analysts were predicting that bottled water would become the second-largest beverage category by 2004(surpassing beer, coffee, and even milk!). There were also predictions that bottled water would account for15 percent of all U.S. beverage sales by 2007. And while bottled-water sales were erupting, the market share of carbonated soft drinks had lost its fizz, remaining steady at around 28 percent.

Given the rapid market growth rate and all the competition, Pepsi and Coca-Cola decided they had better promote their products, just as they did their soft drinks. In 2001, Pepsi launched a $14 million campaign showing how water was a part of real people’s lives. Coca-Cola countered with a $20million campaign that targeted women and used the tagline: "Treat yourself well. Everyday.

"Not to be outdone, Pepsi responded by more than doubling its promotion budget to $40 million in 2002.Included in the advertising was a spot featuring Friends star Lisa Kudrow. Lisa described how refreshing and mouthwatering Aquafina was -emphasizing that it made no promises it couldn't keep. She described Aquafina as "Pure nothing." The ads featured the tagline: "We promise nothing.

"By 2003, the U.S. wholesale bottled-water market had surged to $8.3 billion, up 6.7 percent from 2002.During that same period, wholesale sales of carbonated beverages inched up only 1.5 percent to$45.7 billion. During 2003, Pepsi spent $24 million on Aquafina's advertising, while Coke spent $19million on Dasani's. Although these two brands were number one and number two, respectively, with 17.7and 13 percent market shares, all private-label brands combined took third place with a 10.4 percent market share.

One Aquafina 2003 ad featured black-and-white images of an artist, skier, and guitar player drinking the water and carried the tagline "Aquafina. Purity Guaranteed." In mid 2004, Pepsi altered its purity campaign with a new tagline, "Drink more water.” One ad showed people partying at an English pub and a German beer garden. Instead of drinking beer, however, they were chugging Aquafina. Coke also had an ad showing young people sipping Dasani at a nightclub.

HAVE ANOTHER ROUND

By 2006, the beverage market trends had intensified.Soda sales were fizzling and bottled-water sales were gushing. In 2005, U.S. carbonated-soda volume declined for the first time ever by .2 percent, and the drop was expected to triple in 2006. The carbonated-soda category still reigned as the king of all beverages, boasting the top-selling brands and a two-to-one margin over bottled water. But analysts predicted that if trends continued, bottled water could overtake sodas as early as 2013.

According to a beverage industry analyst, "Thefastest growing products are the ones people view ashealthier or better for you." Indeed, in addition tobottled water, the categories of energy drinks, sportsdrinks, juices, and teas were also experiencing rapidgrowth.

With market conditions so favorable, and Aquafinanow the ninth-best-selling beverage brand in the United States (Dasani was number-ten, but Coke still ruled at number one), Pepsi knew that it could not rest on its laurels. But how does a company expandon water? Well, with more water of course. Brandsand varieties of bottled water were popping up at amind-boggling rate. Spring water, mineral water,purified water, sparkling water, flavored water, vitamin-enhanced water, lightly carbonated water-the bottled-water market was fragmenting fast.

In 2003, Pepsi and Coca-Cola both introduced vitamin enhanced waters with Aquafina Essentials and Dasani NutriWater. Both were quickly discontinued, but Pepsi was not about to give up. It knew that it had to stay ahead of the market. So in2005, Pepsi created two brand extensions, Aquafina Sparkling and Aquafina Flavor Splash. Both brands stayed true to the healthy traits that were propelling water sales (no calories, carbs, or sugar). But Pepsi designed each to satisfy different needs within the market. Aquafina Sparkling was carbonated, unsweetened, and came in unflavored and lightly flavored varieties. By contrast, Flavor Splash was non carbonated, sweetened with Splenda, and had heavier doses of flavor, with Raspberry, Citrus Blend, and Wild Berry varieties.

With Coke hot on its tail with the carbonated Dasani Sensations as well as various flavored Dasanis, Pepsi continued to promote its brands heavily. It fielded a variety of promotional tactics. Aquafina hit the Internet, with ads showing up on the MySpace main page and on commercial and personal destination pages. Pepsi also invested in event sponsorship. Aquafina became a major sponsor of the Olympus Fashion Week in New York and the Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week in Los Angeles. Iteven ran a sweep stakes - style promotion offering anall-expense-paid trip to these fashion events. Pepsi also had Aquafina doing double duty at indie film festivals, with significant sponsorship presence at both Sundance and South By Southwest.

But Pepsi was not about to give up on television. Two years after the successful launch of its "Drink More Water" campaign, Pepsi continued the water-induced jollity of the original ads. In a remake of ascene from the cult classic Animal House, a spot entitled "The Toga" had a John Belushi look-alike convulsing to the song "Shout," performed by the real Otis Day and the Knights. But the big difference between the original movie and this frat-house orgy of excess was that the partiers slammed shots of Aquafina.

ARE THE COLA WARS OVER?

For decades, Pepsi fought to sell more cola than Coke. It now appears that Pepsi may have willingly conceded the number one cola honor to Coke. Although it hasn't given up on keeping the Pepsi brand at a strong number two, it has been quietly taking another route to kicking Coke's can. In fact, in December of 2005, Pepsi Co surpassed Coca-Cola in market capitalization for the first time in the 108-year rivalry. In the five previous years, PepsiCo's stock had risen by more than a third while Coke's had dropped by the same amount.

What drove this changing of the guard? Without question, one of the most significant factors is Pepsi’s lead in growth categories, such as bottled water.” They were the first to recognize that the consumer was moving to non carbonated products, and they innovated aggressively," observed the analyst. That non carbonated beverages are growing so rapidly bodes very well for Pepsi. Some 35 to 40 percent of its beverage sales are in non carbonated categories, as opposed to only 15 percent for Coca-Cola.

But while Coca-Cola seems to be putting of effort into bottled water, it also may be overly confident in the number one brand. When asked about the trend of sales for carbonated and non carbonated beverages, a Coca-Cola spokesman insisted that the beverage giant is bucking the trend. “We believe we continue to grow carbonated soft drinks," he said, noting that Coke’s soda volume was up 1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2005. But whereas a small increase in a huge, flat market might be one thing, a large increase in expanding markets is quite another. Losing the cola wars may be the best thing that ever happened to Pepsi.
 

Questions for Discussion:

  1. What markets should Pepsi target for Aquafina?

  1. What recommendations would you make foradvertising objectives, message strategy, andmessage execution for Aquafina?

  1. What advertising media recommendationswould you make for Aquafina, and how wouldyou evaluate the effectiveness of those mediaand your advertising?

  1. What sales promotion and public relationsrecommendations would you make forAquafina?

  1. What recommendations would you make forpromoting Aquafina Sparkling and FlavorSplash?

  1. To what extent is Aquefina's sales growthattributable to advertising and promotion versusthe growing dynamics of the market?

  1. Briefly examine bottled water industry in Koreaincluding carbonated soft drink market. Identifykey marketing problems and suggest yourmarketing recommendations to deal with theidentified problems.

Sources:

Kate MacArthur, "Bleak Future Predicted for Fizz Biz;" Advertising Age, June 29.2008; KarenHerzog, "DRINK". New Beverages Join the Coke-Pepsi Wars;" Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. June 7.2006, p. 1; Lewis Lasers, "Aqua-Boogie Spots Hit Allthe Right Notes," Chicago Sun 71tnes, May 10, 2006,p. 71; Katrina Brooker, "How Pepsi Outgunned Coke," Fortune, February 1, 2006, accessed online atwww.fortune.com; "Aquafina Brings Flavor and Fizzto the Water Aisle," PR Newswire, January 24, 2005;"Beverage Industry Fact Sheet," accessed atwww.bevexpo.comIbevtndfactsheet.asp; "NoSlowdown in Sight for Bottled Water," BeverageIndustry, September 2003, p. 22; Betsy McKay, "In aWater Fight, Coke and Pepsi 31y Opposite 'lacks,"Wall Street Journal, April 18, 2002. p. Al; BetsyMcKay, "Coke and Pepsi Escalate Their WaterFight," Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2001, p. B8.

You Can Read Also:
The Cola Wars still rage – Pepsi facility sponsorship and Coca-Cola-sponsored hallmark events in Denver

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post